Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 7, 2025

Global Media Network; William Scales v. Sirius XM Radio

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-06157
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Global Media Network v. Sirius XM Radio, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Global Media Network and William Scales; Sirius XM Radio; and anyone seeking to appeal without paying the required fees.

What happened

In Global Media Network; William Scales v. Sirius XM Radio, the court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. The judgment gives no further explanation and refers to an October 2, 2025, order that is not included here.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for an appeal.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on October 7, 2025. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Global Media Network; William Scales v. Sirius XM Radio · No. 1:25-cv-06157
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 7, 2025

Ruling

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action “for the reasons stated” in its October 2, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided text, so the basis for dismissal and whether the court reached the merits cannot be determined from this judgment alone.

Appeal Status

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied in forma pauperis status—that is, permission to appeal without paying the required fees—for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition

The action was dismissed. The judgment does not say that the dismissal was with prejudice or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.