Santiago Carrera Alejandro v. Viand Coffee Shop of 61 St., inc. et al.
- Lewis Liman
- 1:25-cv-02718
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Santiago Carrera Alejandro v. Viand Coffee Shop of 61 St., inc., Judge Liman ordered the parties to report whether a settlement hearing should be scheduled.
The parties to the case, Santiago Carrera Alejandro and the defendants, were directed to report whether a settlement hearing should be scheduled.
What happened
Santiago Carrera Alejandro v. Viand Coffee Shop of 61 St., inc. concerns a settlement reached by the parties on all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement terms.
The court directed the parties to inform it by October 14, 2025, whether it should schedule a hearing required under the cited Second Circuit decision Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.
Judge Liman issued the order on October 8, 2025. The order does not state that the court approved the settlement or enter a final judgment.
The detailed version
- Santiago Carrera Alejandro v. Viand Coffee Shop of 61 St., inc. et al. · No. 1:25-cv-02718
- Lewis Liman
- Oct. 8, 2025
Background
The court stated that it had been informed that the parties reached a settlement on all issues. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims, describe the settlement terms, or state whether the parties were represented by counsel.
Court’s Order
The court directed the parties to inform it by October 14, 2025, whether it should schedule a hearing required under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The order does not state that the court approved the settlement, schedule a hearing, or enter final judgment.
Effect
The order addresses the next step concerning a possible settlement hearing. It does not decide the underlying legal claims or state the terms of the settlement.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.