Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2025

ViaHart, LLC v. Creative Kids Online, LLC, et al.

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:20-cv-09943
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In ViaHart v. Creative Kids Online, Judge Woods ordered witness lists made public because nothing defeated public access.

Who this affects

The parties whose proposed witness lists were filed under seal, and members of the public seeking access to those filings.

What happened

ViaHart, LLC v. Creative Kids Online, LLC involved proposed witness lists that the parties filed under seal after the court ordered final lists for trial.

The court found nothing in the recent filings that overcame the usual presumption that judicial documents should be publicly accessible. The parties had also previously filed a joint list of possible witnesses publicly.

Judge Gregory H. Woods directed the Clerk of Court to change the viewing level of the two filings so the public could view them.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
ViaHart, LLC v. Creative Kids Online, LLC, et al. · No. 1:20-cv-09943
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Oct. 13, 2025

Background

The court had ordered the parties to file a final list of people who might testify at trial by September 1, 2025. On that date, the parties filed their proposed witness lists under seal without first asking the court for permission. The parties had previously filed a joint list of possible witnesses publicly.

Public Access

The court reviewed the recent filings and found nothing that would overcome the presumption that judicial documents should be available to the public.

Ruling

Judge Gregory H. Woods directed the Clerk of Court to change the viewing level of the documents filed at Docket Nos. 309 and 311 so that the public could view them.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.