Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 14, 2025

Tian v. LIANGTSE KG WELLNESS ONE LLC

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:24-cv-05519
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Xiao Qing Tian v. Liangtse KG Wellness One LLC, Judge Clarke ordered deadlines for counsel and warned of possible default judgments.

Who this affects

Liangtse KG Wellness One LLC, individual defendants Xiaozhe Liu and Hui Jing Zhu, and the plaintiffs XIAO QING TIAN et al.

What happened

In Xiao Qing Tian et al. v. Liangtse KG Wellness One LLC et al., Liangtse’s previous lawyer was allowed to withdraw after reporting nonpayment of fees. The company did not obtain new counsel by the earlier deadline.

The court ordered Liangtse to retain a lawyer by November 10, 2025, and required that lawyer to file a notice of appearance by November 15. If no lawyer appears, the plaintiffs must seek a default judgment against Liangtse by December 1. The individual defendants, Xiaozhe Liu and Hui Jing Zhu, must also tell the court whether they will hire lawyers or defend themselves.

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke warned that failing to meet these requirements could lead to a default judgment, and that failing to timely seek default judgment against Liangtse could lead to dismissal as to that defendant for failure to prosecute. The plaintiffs must serve the order on all defendants and file proof of service.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tian v. LIANGTSE KG WELLNESS ONE LLC · No. 1:24-cv-05519
Judge
Clarke
Date
Oct. 14, 2025

Background

On July 18, 2025, prior counsel for Defendant Liangtse KG Wellness One LLC petitioned to withdraw because of unpaid fees. On August 8, 2025, the Court granted that request, ordered Liangtse to retain new counsel, and required new counsel to appear by September 10, 2025. The opinion states that no new counsel had appeared for Liangtse as of the date of this order.

Court’s directives

The Court explained that a corporation cannot appear in federal court without a lawyer. It ordered Liangtse to retain counsel no later than November 10, 2025, and required Liangtse’s counsel to file a notice of appearance no later than November 15, 2025.

If no counsel appears by November 15, the plaintiffs must file a motion for default judgment concerning Liangtse by December 1, 2025, under the Court’s Individual Rules and Local Rule 55. The Court warned that failing to timely file that motion may result in dismissal of the action as to Liangtse for failure to prosecute.

The Court separately directed individual Defendants Xiaozhe Liu, also known as “DJ Liu,” and Hui Jing Zhu, also known as “Kelly Zhu,” to tell the Court by November 10, 2025, whether they intend to retain counsel or defend the action without counsel. The Court warned that failing to file that letter on time may result in a default judgment against them.

Service and disposition

The plaintiffs must serve the order on all defendants by October 16, 2025, and file proof of service by October 17, 2025. Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke issued this order setting counsel, response, and service deadlines; it did not enter a default judgment in the opinion text.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.