Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 14, 2025

Cruz v. West 4th Marketplace

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:24-cv-07532
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Cruz v. West 4th Marketplace, Judge Broderick extended Cruz’s default-judgment-motion deadline to November 5 and ordered her to file against four previously served defendants.

Who this affects

Cruz and the four originally served defendants—West 4th Marketplace, Inc., Hungry & Healthy Marketplace LLC, Riverside Gourmet Deli, and Abdul LNU—were affected. Cruz received more time to file a default-judgment motion and was ordered to file it against those defendants by November 5, 2025.

What happened

In Cruz v. West 4th Marketplace, Inc., et al., Cruz sued over alleged unpaid wages, missing employment paperwork, pregnancy discrimination, and retaliation under federal and New York laws. She later amended the complaint to add three defendants but added no new claims against the four defendants served with the original complaint.

Cruz asked for more time to seek a default judgment and explained that her law firm faced staffing problems, religious-holiday absences, a trial, and an appellate brief deadline. She also argued that she did not need to serve the amended complaint on the four original defendants because it added no claims against them.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick extended the deadline for Cruz’s default-judgment motion to November 5, 2025. He ruled that service was sufficient as to the four original defendants and ordered Cruz to file a default-judgment motion against them by that date.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cruz v. West 4th Marketplace · No. 1:24-cv-07532
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Oct. 14, 2025

Background

Cruz’s complaint asserted claims for unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law, failure to provide required employment paperwork under New York law, and pregnancy discrimination and retaliation under New York human-rights laws. She initially sued West 4th Marketplace, Inc., Hungry & Healthy Marketplace LLC, Riverside Gourmet Deli, and Abdul LNU. The opinion text states that Cruz served those defendants with the original complaint and that they did not appear. Cruz later filed an amended complaint adding Salimen Nagi, Mosa Nagi, and Hamza Nagi, without adding claims against the four originally served defendants.

Requests and Service Issue

Cruz requested an extension of the October 20, 2025 deadline to file a motion for default judgment, asking to move the deadline to November 5, 2025. She cited the unexpected resignation of her firm’s only paralegal and office manager, religious-holiday absences, an upcoming trial, and an appellate brief deadline. Cruz also argued that Rule 5(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure did not require service of the amended complaint on the original defendants because the amended complaint asserted no new claims for relief against them.

Ruling

The court stated that service of process was sufficient as to West 4th Marketplace, Inc., Hungry & Healthy Marketplace LLC, Riverside Gourmet Deli, and Abdul LNU because Cruz had served the initial complaint and the amended complaint added no new claims against them. The court extended the deadline for Cruz to file a default-judgment motion from October 20 to November 5, 2025. Because Cruz had not sought default against those four defendants, the court ordered her to file a default-judgment motion against them by November 5, 2025. The order addressed the filing deadline and service issue; it did not enter default judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.