Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 10, 2025

Regel v. Campbell Soup Company

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:24-cv-06541
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Regel v. Campbell Soup Company, Judge Karas granted the request to seal two exhibits attached to defendants’ summary-judgment motion.

Who this affects

The parties, the nonparties whose transaction details appear in Exhibit K, and the plaintiff whose income-tax information appears in Exhibit P.

What happened

In Regel v. Campbell Soup Company, et al., the defendants asked to file two exhibits under seal, with viewing limited to selected parties. The exhibits were attached to their motion for summary judgment.

Exhibit K contains private transactions involving nonparties and identifies specific business entities. Exhibit P contains information from the plaintiff’s income-tax filings. The plaintiff consented to the request, and the defendants did not oppose sealing Exhibit P.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas granted the request and ordered the documents sealed. The opinion does not provide a separate explanation beyond the parties’ request and the court’s approval.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Regel v. Campbell Soup Company · No. 7:24-cv-06541
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Oct. 10, 2025

Request

Defendants asked the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to file Exhibit K and Exhibit P to the declaration supporting their summary-judgment motion under seal. They requested that viewing access be limited to selected parties. The letter states that the plaintiff consented to the request.

Reasons Given for Sealing

The defendants said Exhibit K contains details of private transactions involving nonparties, including the names of specific business entities. They said the exhibit was submitted to address whether the plaintiff was properly classified as an independent contractor, but that the nonparties’ identities and transaction details were not relevant to that purpose.

Exhibit P contains information from the plaintiff’s income-tax filings. The letter says the plaintiff supplied authorities supporting the sealing of that exhibit because tax information is private. The defendants took no position on those authorities and did not oppose the plaintiff’s request to seal Exhibit P.

Ruling

Judge Kenneth M. Karas granted the request. The order therefore allowed Exhibits K and P to be filed under seal with viewing access limited to selected parties. The opinion does not state any additional conditions or provide a separate analysis of the sealing request.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.