Grajales v. Eli Lilly and Company
Jose Antonio Grajales v. Eli Lilly and Company; Mr. F. Foo, M.D. Beeper # 1389; The New York City Civil Court Judge’s; and United State of America Civil Judge’s.
- James Oetken
- 1:23-cv-06972
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Grajales v. Eli Lily, Judge Oetken dismissed the action and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Jose Antonio Grajales and the defendants named in the judgment were affected because the court dismissed the action. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.
What happened
In Jose Antonio Grajales v. Eli Lily and Company, the court entered a judgment dismissing the action against the named defendants.
The judgment gives no reason for the dismissal itself. It says the reasons were stated in an October 14, 2025 order, but that order is not included in the provided opinion.
Judge Oetken also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.
The detailed version
- Grajales v. Eli Lilly and Company · No. 1:23-cv-06972
- James Oetken
- Oct. 15, 2025
Disposition
The court dismissed the action. The judgment states that the dismissal was based on the reasons given in an October 14, 2025 order, but that order is not included in the provided text.
Appeal Certification
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States for the principle that an appeal is taken in good faith when the appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.
Limits of the Provided Opinion
The judgment does not explain the basis for dismissal, identify the claims addressed, or state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice. Based on the provided text, the court's ruling is a procedural disposition rather than a ruling on the underlying legal issues.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.