Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 15, 2025

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York v. F.I.P., Inc.

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:25-cv-08336
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Trustees v. F.I.P., Inc.: Judge Ho set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners and F.I.P., Inc., because the order sets their filing, response, reply, and service deadlines.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York v. F.I.P., Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by November 5, 2025. F.I.P., Inc.’s opposition, if any, is due November 26, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, is due December 3.

Judge Ho also required the petitioners to serve F.I.P., Inc. with the petition, supporting papers, and the order under the federal service rule, and to file proof of service. The order did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:25-cv-08336
Judge
Ho
Date
Oct. 15, 2025

Background

On October 8, 2025, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion does not describe the arbitration award, the underlying dispute, or the petitioners’ specific arguments.

Court’s Order

The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment. It ordered the petitioners to file any additional materials supporting the petition by November 5, 2025. F.I.P., Inc.’s opposition, if any, is due November 26, 2025, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, is due December 3, 2025.

The petitioners must also serve F.I.P., Inc. with the petition, all supporting papers, and the order under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by November 5, 2025. They must file an affidavit showing that service occurred by November 6, 2025.

Disposition

The court entered a scheduling and service order. It did not rule on whether the arbitration award should be confirmed. The order was signed by Dale E. Ho, United States District Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.