Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 15, 2025

In re: Clifford Smith

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-08246
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In re: Clifford Smith was transferred for improper venue; Judge Swain sent the case to New York’s Northern District.

Who this affects

Clifford Smith and the correctional staff he accused of denying him access to hearing aids; the case will proceed, if at all, in the Northern District of New York.

What happened

In re: Clifford Smith began when Clifford Smith, who is incarcerated at Eastern Correctional Facility, sent the court a letter alleging that correctional staff denied him access to hearing aids. He filed without a lawyer, and the Clerk’s Office opened the letter as a civil case.

The court said the alleged events occurred at Eastern in Napanoch, Ulster County, which is in the Northern District of New York. Because Smith did not name any defendants, the court could not assess whether venue was proper based on where defendants lived, but it found venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York.

Judge Swain ordered the case transferred to the Northern District of New York in the interest of justice and directed the Clerk to close the Southern District case. The court did not decide whether Smith may proceed without paying filing fees; that decision will be made by the receiving court. It also denied fee-free status for an appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In re: Clifford Smith · No. 1:25-cv-08246
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 15, 2025

Background

Clifford Smith, who is incarcerated at Eastern Correctional Facility, submitted a letter to the Southern District of New York without a lawyer. He alleged that correctional staff at Eastern denied him access to hearing aids. The Clerk’s Office opened the letter as a new civil action. Smith did not name any defendants, submit payment, or file an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Venue analysis

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391, which generally permits a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority. The court explained that it could not evaluate venue based on the defendants’ residences because Smith had not identified any defendants. It found, however, that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because the alleged events occurred at Eastern in Napanoch, Ulster County.

The court determined that Napanoch is in the Northern District of New York. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), when a case is filed in the wrong venue, a court may dismiss it or transfer it to a district where it could have been brought if transfer serves the interests of justice.

Ruling and effect

The court ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York under § 1406(a). The order closed the Southern District case, and no summons would issue from that court. The court left the decision about whether Smith may proceed without prepaying fees to the transferee court. It certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order transferred the case without deciding the underlying allegation about access to hearing aids.

Judge

The order was signed by Laura Taylor Swain, Chief United States District Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.