Moran v. Esupplements
Washington Moran, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. Esupplements, LLC
- Rochon
- 1:25-cv-08551
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Washington Moran v. Esupplements, Judge Rochon ordered settlement discussions and a follow-up joint letter without deciding standing or the case’s merits.
Washington Moran, the people he seeks to represent, and Esupplements, LLC are affected by the required settlement meeting and joint status letter.
What happened
Washington Moran brought this case against Esupplements, LLC on behalf of himself and other similarly situated people. The order required the parties to meet and discuss settlement.
The parties must meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint are served. They must consider whether Moran has standing, meaning a sufficient legal connection to bring the case, and whether further settlement discussions through mediation or a magistrate judge would help.
Within 45 days after service, the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled and, if not, whether they want mediation, a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, or an initial status conference. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon did not decide standing or the merits of the case.
The detailed version
- Moran v. Esupplements · No. 1:25-cv-08551
- Rochon
- Oct. 17, 2025
Order
The court ordered Washington Moran and Esupplements, LLC to meet and confer—meaning meet and discuss the case—in a good-faith effort to settle. The meeting must last at least one hour and occur within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint.
Issues to Discuss
The parties must consider whether Moran has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. Standing is the legal requirement that a plaintiff have a sufficient connection to the alleged injury to bring the case. The court did not decide whether Moran has standing. If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must also discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive.
Follow-Up Filing
Within 15 additional days, or 45 days after service of the summons and complaint, the parties must file a joint letter telling the court whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, with a stated preference between those options, or an initial status conference.
The order addresses settlement and case-management steps. It does not decide standing, liability, or any other merits issue.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.