Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 16, 2025

Friedeberg v. Either Ms. Broderick or Ms. Bronson Whichever is the Resident…

Full caption

Donna L. Friedeberg v. Either Ms. Broderick or Ms. Bronson Whichever is the Resident Woman at #15 Ripley Place, Norwich, CT 06360

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-08248
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Friedeberg v. Either Ms. Broderick or Ms. Brosnon: Chief Judge Swain transferred the case to Connecticut because venue was improper in New York.

Who this affects

Donna L. Friedeberg and the person identified as either Ms. Broderick or Ms. Bronson, the named defendant. The case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the District of Connecticut.

What happened

In Donna L. Friedeberg v. Either Ms. Broderick or Ms. Brosnon Whichever Is the Resident Woman at #15 Ripley Place, Norwich, CT 06360, Donna L. Friedeberg sued a person identified as either Ms. Broderick or Ms. Bronson. She represented herself. The court noted that she had not signed the complaint, paid the filing fee, or submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court found that the named defendant apparently resides in Connecticut and that the alleged events occurred there. It concluded that the Southern District of New York was not a proper venue and that the District of Connecticut was the only proper venue.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk to transfer the case to the District of Connecticut under the federal venue statute. She left the decision about whether Friedeberg could proceed without prepaying fees to the receiving court, directed that no summons issue from the New York court, and stated that an appeal could not proceed without prepayment of fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Friedeberg v. Either Ms. Broderick or Ms. Bronson Whichever is the Resident… · No. 1:25-cv-08248
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 16, 2025

Background

Donna L. Friedeberg brought the action without a lawyer in the Southern District of New York. The caption identifies the defendant as “EITHER MS. BRODERICK OR MS. BROSNON WHICHEVER IS THE RESIDENT WOMAN AT #15 RIPLEY PLACE, NORWICH, CT 06360.” In the body of the opinion, the defendant is identified as either Ms. Broderick or Ms. Bronson. Friedeberg had not signed her complaint, paid the filing fees, or submitted an application to proceed without prepaying those fees.

Venue analysis

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), the federal statute governing the proper location for a civil case. That statute generally permits a case to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, if neither applies, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority.

The court determined that Friedeberg appeared to allege that the defendant resided in Connecticut. Because Connecticut is one federal judicial district, the District of Connecticut was a proper venue based on the defendant’s residence. The court also determined that the alleged events appeared to have occurred in Connecticut and that Friedeberg identified nothing showing that the events occurred in the Southern District of New York. The court therefore concluded that New York was not a proper venue and that the District of Connecticut was the only proper venue.

Ruling and effect

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, a court may dismiss a case filed in the wrong venue or, when justice requires, transfer it to a district where it could have been filed. The court transferred this action to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in the interest of justice.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action. It left the question whether Friedeberg could proceed without prepaying fees to the transferee court, directed that no summons issue from the Southern District of New York, and stated that the order closed the action in that court. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.