Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 22, 2025

SS&C Tech. Holdings, Inc. et al. v. D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.

Judge
Reif
Docket
1:23-cv-09158
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In SS&C Tech. Holdings v. D. E. Shaw, Judge Reif addressed SS&C’s request to seal materials containing sensitive pricing information.

Who this affects

SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc., Advent Software, Inc., D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P., and members of the public seeking access to the court filings.

What happened

In SS&C Tech. Holdings, Inc. et al. v. D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P., SS&C asked to file unredacted exhibits and an unredacted legal memorandum under seal while seeking dismissal of D. E. Shaw’s counterclaims.

SS&C said the materials contained commercially sensitive and trade-secret information about its pricing for Geneva and related services. It argued that disclosure could harm its competitive position, while acknowledging the public’s general right to access court documents.

The document ends with “SO ORDERED” and is signed by Timothy M. Reif, sitting by designation. The text provided does not separately state whether the sealing request was granted or denied.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
SS&C Tech. Holdings, Inc. et al. v. D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P. · No. 1:23-cv-09158
Judge
Reif
Date
Oct. 22, 2025

Background

SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. and Advent Software, Inc., collectively identified as “SS&C,” submitted a letter asking to file certain materials under seal. The requested materials were unredacted exhibits filed with SS&C’s memorandum supporting its motion to dismiss counterclaims brought by D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P., identified as “DESCO,” and an unredacted version of that memorandum.

Grounds for the Request

SS&C stated that the exhibits and parts of the memorandum contained or reflected commercially sensitive and trade-secret information concerning SS&C’s pricing for Geneva and related Geneva services. SS&C argued that this information is protected because disclosure could harm a litigant’s competitive standing. The letter also discussed the general presumption that judicial documents should be publicly accessible and the need to weigh that presumption against privacy and competitive interests.

Disposition

The document concludes with “SO ORDERED” and identifies Timothy M. Reif as the judge of the United States Court of International Trade sitting by designation in the Southern District of New York. The text provided does not expressly use the words “granted,” “denied,” or “granted in part and denied in part” for the sealing request. It therefore confirms that an order was entered but does not state the precise disposition in those terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.