Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 31, 2025

McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:24-cv-08442
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Donte McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC, Judge Vyskocil ordered Marshals to serve Webull after allowing McClellon to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Donte McClellon and Webull Financial LLC; the order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to arrange service of the lawsuit on Webull.

What happened

Donte McClellon sued Webull Financial LLC without a lawyer, relying on the court’s diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Because McClellon received that permission, the court said he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Webull. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after a summons is issued, rather than 90 days after the complaint was filed.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the Clerk of Court to issue Webull’s summons, prepare the service paperwork, and send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC · No. 1:24-cv-08442
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Oct. 31, 2025

Background

Donte McClellon brought the action against Webull Financial LLC without a lawyer, invoking the court’s diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction. In an earlier order dated March 11, 2025, the court allowed McClellon to proceed without prepaying fees. The opinion explains that permission as allowing a party to proceed without prepayment of fees.

Service of process

Because McClellon was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Webull. The court therefore instructed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for Webull, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with Webull’s address, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.

The court explained that the usual rule generally requires service within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Because McClellon could not serve the complaint until the court reviewed it and ordered a summons, the court extended his service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, McClellon should request an extension of time. He must also notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so. The Clerk was also directed to mail McClellon an information package.

Disposition

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered an order directing the Clerk and the Marshals Service to take steps to serve Webull. The opinion did not resolve the merits of McClellon’s claims or Webull’s potential defenses.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.