Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 31, 2025

Trotman v. Warden NYC DOC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-09037
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Trotman v. Warden NYC DOC, Judge Swain ordered Plaintiff to correct his fee forms or pay $405 within 30 days.

Who this affects

David M. Trotman and the processing of his civil action; the order also concerns deductions from his prisoner account if IFP status is granted.

What happened

David M. Trotman v. Warden NYC DOC, et al. is a civil case brought by an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself. The court said he must either pay the required filing and administrative fees or request permission to proceed without paying them upfront.

The court found that Trotman’s handwritten application and prisoner authorization did not authorize the correct deductions. It ordered him, within 30 days, to pay $405 or submit the attached amended forms. No summons will issue at this time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the case be processed if Trotman complies and stated that the action will be dismissed if he does not. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees because the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trotman v. Warden NYC DOC · No. 1:25-cv-09037
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 31, 2025

Background

David M. Trotman, who is incarcerated at the George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island, brought this action without a lawyer. The order addresses only the filing-fee requirements; it does not decide the merits of his claims.

A prisoner filing a civil action in the district court must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying the fees. That request is called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or IFP. If the court grants IFP status, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner must therefore also submit an authorization directing the facility to make those deductions and provide certified account statements for the previous six months.

Court’s Action

Trotman submitted an IFP application and prisoner authorization, but the court found that the forms were handwritten and did not authorize the correct deductions. The court ordered him, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the full $405 or to complete and submit the attached amended IFP application and amended prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 25-CV-9037 (LTS).

No summons will issue at this time. If Trotman complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed period, the action will be dismissed. The court also certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order cautioned that certain future dismissals of prisoner actions can count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), but it did not make such a dismissal here.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.