Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 31, 2025

Rodriguez v. Jay Global Enterprises

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:24-cv-06278
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rodriguez v. Jay Global Enterprises, Judge Netburn approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

Walter L. Rodriguez and the defendants, including Jay Global Enterprises, Inc.; the action was dismissed with prejudice after the court approved their settlement.

What happened

In Walter L. Rodriguez v. Jay Global Enterprises, Inc., et al., the parties reached a settlement in principle in a Fair Labor Standards Act case and submitted their proposed agreement for court review.

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

Judge Sarah Netburn approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning the case was ended and could not be brought again. The clerk was directed to terminate a pending motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez v. Jay Global Enterprises · No. 1:24-cv-06278
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Oct. 31, 2025

Background

This was a Fair Labor Standards Act case. The parties agreed to settlement terms in principle and submitted a proposed settlement agreement for the court’s review.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the required review process for Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. It determined that the settlement was fair and reasonable. The opinion does not state the settlement’s specific terms or explain the parties’ underlying claims in further detail.

Disposition

The court approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice. It also requested that the Clerk of Court terminate the motion listed at ECF No. 44.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.