Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 3, 2025

Shany v. Tinsley

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-08040
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Gabriel Bar Shany v. Chris Tinsley, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs’ action was dismissed, and the plaintiffs were denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fee. The judgment also affects the defendants because it ends the action in the district court.

What happened

In Gabriel Bar Shany, et al. v. Chris Tinsley, et al., the court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. The judgment says the dismissal was based on reasons stated in an October 31, 2025 order, which is not included here.

The court also determined that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied the plaintiffs permission to proceed without paying the appeal filing fee. The judgment does not explain the basis for dismissing the action.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on November 3, 2025, in the Southern District of New York.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shany v. Tinsley · No. 1:25-cv-08040
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 3, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. It stated that the dismissal was for the reasons given in an October 31, 2025 order, but that order is not included in the provided opinion text. The available text therefore does not identify the claims, the parties’ arguments, or the court’s substantive or procedural reasoning for dismissal.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. Based on that certification, it denied in forma pauperis status for the purpose of an appeal. In plain English, the plaintiffs were not allowed to pursue an appeal without paying the required filing fees based on the court’s finding.

Effect

The action was dismissed, and the appeal-related fee-waiver request was denied. The provided text does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice, and it does not provide the reasons for dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.