Reyes v. DC White Plains LLC
- Philip Halpern
- 7:24-cv-09522
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Rudis Reyes v. DC White Plains LLC, Judge Halpern ordered the parties to file settlement papers or a proposed judgment after mediation resolved all issues.
The plaintiffs and defendants, who had reached an agreement on all issues through mediation, were required to file one of the specified settlement-related documents.
What happened
In Rudis Reyes, et al. v. DC White Plains LLC (d/b/a Don Coqui), et al., the docket showed that mediation had taken place and that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues.
The order required the parties to file by November 17, 2025, either a joint submission seeking court review of the settlement with a fully signed settlement agreement, or a proposed judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.
Judge Philip M. Halpern issued the order on November 3, 2025. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.
The detailed version
- Reyes v. DC White Plains LLC · No. 7:24-cv-09522
- Philip Halpern
- Nov. 3, 2025
Background
The docket indicated that the parties participated in mediation and reached an agreement on all issues. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide the terms of the agreement.
Order
The court ordered the parties to file, by November 17, 2025, one of two types of documents:
1. A joint submission asking the court to review the settlement, together with a fully executed proposed settlement agreement; or 2. A proposed judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.
The court cited Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Rest., Inc., 944 F.3d 395, 398 (2d Cir. 2019), in connection with the required filing. The order does not itself approve the settlement or enter judgment.
Disposition
Judge Philip M. Halpern ordered the parties to make one of the specified filings by November 17, 2025.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.