WINE v. SHERRY-LEHMANN
WINE, LIQUOR & DISTILLER WORKERS’ UNION, UFCW LOCAL 1-D PENSION FUND v. SHERRY-LEHMANN, INC.
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:24-cv-04945
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In Wine, Liquor & Distiller Workers’ Union, UFCW Local 1-D Pension Fund v. Sherry-Lehmann, Inc., Judge Schofield awarded the pension fund $1,475,184.38.
Wine, Liquor & Distiller Workers’ Union, UFCW Local 1-D Pension Fund received a monetary judgment, and Sherry-Lehmann, Inc. was ordered to pay the judgment, post-judgment interest, and the listed costs and fees.
What happened
In Wine, Liquor & Distiller Workers’ Union, UFCW Local 1-D Pension Fund v. Sherry-Lehmann, Inc., the court had already entered a default judgment against Sherry-Lehmann for unpaid withdrawal liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The remaining issue was the amount owed.
The court adopted a magistrate judge’s recommended damages calculation with modifications. It awarded $954,677.00 in unpaid withdrawal liability, $245,286.80 in interest, $245,286.80 in liquidated damages, $28,410.00 in attorneys’ fees, and $1,523.78 in costs, for a total of $1,475,184.38. The court also ordered post-judgment interest until the judgment is paid and directed the clerk to close the case.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield found no clear error in most of the recommendation, corrected the attorneys’ fee calculation, adopted the report as modified, entered judgment, and closed the case.
The detailed version
- WINE v. SHERRY-LEHMANN · No. 1:24-cv-04945
- Lorna Schofield
- Nov. 5, 2025
Background
The pension fund sued Sherry-Lehmann, Inc. for unpaid withdrawal liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). On October 10, 2024, the court entered a default judgment against Sherry-Lehmann. A default judgment is a judgment entered after a party fails to defend the case. The court referred the calculation of damages to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn for a damages inquest, which is a proceeding to determine the amount owed.
On February 27, 2025, Magistrate Judge Netburn issued a report and recommendation. The report recommended $954,677.00 in unpaid withdrawal liability; interest at $470.80 per day beginning June 2, 2024; the greater of that interest or liquidated damages equal to 20% of the unpaid liability; $31,125.00 in attorneys’ fees; $1,523.78 in costs; and post-judgment interest. Sherry-Lehmann was served with the report on July 31, 2025, and no party objected.
Court’s Analysis
Because no objections were filed, the court reviewed the report for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake on the face of the record. Judge Lorna G. Schofield found no clear error concerning the unpaid withdrawal liability, interest, liquidated damages, costs, or post-judgment interest.
The court adopted the recommendation that liquidated damages would be the greater of interest on delinquent payments or 20% of the unpaid liability. As of the judgment date, the interest amount was $245,286.80, which exceeded the recommended $190,935.40 in liquidated damages based on 20% of the unpaid liability. The court therefore awarded $245,286.80 in liquidated damages and $245,286.80 in interest.
The court modified the attorneys’ fee calculation. It found that an hourly rate of $325 was reasonable for associate Zachary F. Ramsfelder. Using the recommended hours—20.9 hours for Raymond M. Baldino, 2.9 hours for Andrew F. Zazzali, Jr., and 50.8 hours for Ramsfelder—and hourly rates of $500 for Baldino and Zazzali and $325 for Ramsfelder, the court calculated reasonable attorneys’ fees of $28,410.00 rather than $31,125.00.
Disposition
The order adopted the report and recommendation as modified. It awarded the pension fund $1,475,184.38, consisting of $954,677.00 in unpaid withdrawal liability, $245,286.80 in interest through the judgment date, $245,286.80 in liquidated damages, $28,410.00 in attorneys’ fees, and $1,523.78 in costs.
The court also ordered Sherry-Lehmann to pay post-judgment interest from the date the clerk entered judgment until the judgment was satisfied, at the federal rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Judge Lorna G. Schofield directed the clerk to enter judgment and close the case.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund…Jan 2023
- Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund…Jan 2023
- Woov. Kaiser Foundation
- Operating Engineers’ Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, et…Aug 2026
- Randallv. GreatBanc Trust
- Gomezv. Edison Lithograph