Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 5, 2025

Jarrar v. Evergreen Shipping Agency Corp.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-06722
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mohammad Jarrar v. Evergreen Shipping Agency, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Mohammad Jarrar’s action against Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corp. was dismissed, and the court denied fee-free status for any appeal.

What happened

In Mohammad Jarrar v. Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corp., the court entered a judgment dismissing the action for reasons stated in a November 3, 2025, order.

The judgment provided here does not explain the reason for dismissal. It states that any appeal would not be considered to be in good faith and denies Mohammad Jarrar permission to appeal without paying court fees.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on November 5, 2025. The court dismissed the action and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jarrar v. Evergreen Shipping Agency Corp. · No. 1:25-cv-06722
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 5, 2025

What the Judgment Says

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing Mohammad Jarrar’s action against Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corp. The judgment states that the dismissal was based on reasons given in a November 3, 2025, order, but that order is not included in the provided text.

Appeal-Fee Ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status, meaning permission to proceed without paying the usual court fees, for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action. She also denied in forma pauperis status for an appeal. The provided judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice, or whether it reached the merits of the claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.