Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 5, 2025

Saamishvili v. Flanagan

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:25-cv-09181
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Zurab Saamishvili v. Bryan Flanagan, Judge Ramos transferred the immigration-detention habeas petition to the Eastern District of New York.

Who this affects

Zurab Saamishvili's § 2241 petition will be considered, if appropriate, by the Eastern District of New York rather than the Southern District of New York; the government is temporarily barred from removing him from a facility within either district unless the transferee court orders otherwise.

What happened

Zurab Saamishvili, who is detained at the Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center, filed a petition asking a federal court to review his ongoing immigration proceedings. The case was filed in the Southern District of New York against Bryan Flanagan and others.

The court concluded that a petition challenging physical confinement generally belongs in the district where the person is detained because that court has authority over the custodian. Because Saamishvili is detained in Brooklyn, the court transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York without deciding the petition's underlying claims.

Judge Edgardo Ramos also barred the government from removing Saamishvili from a facility in the Southern or Eastern Districts of New York while the transfer occurs, waived the usual seven-day transfer delay, and directed the clerk to transfer the case. The order closed the case in the Southern District of New York.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Saamishvili v. Flanagan · No. 1:25-cv-09181
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Nov. 5, 2025

Background

Zurab Saamishvili, who is detained at the Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A § 2241 habeas petition is a request for judicial review of a person's custody or detention. Saamishvili's petition challenges his ongoing immigration proceedings.

Transfer

The Southern District of New York held that a court handling a § 2241 petition must have jurisdiction over the petitioner's custodian. For a petition challenging physical confinement, that jurisdiction generally lies in the federal district where the person is confined. The court found that the Brooklyn detention facility is in the Eastern District of New York and therefore transferred the action there in the interest of justice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), as cited in the order.

Additional Orders and Disposition

The court directed the clerk to transfer the action to the Eastern District of New York. To preserve the status quo and give that court an opportunity to consider the petition, the court enjoined, meaning prohibited, the government from removing Saamishvili from a facility within the Southern or Eastern Districts of New York unless the transferee court orders otherwise. The court waived the seven-day delay required by Local Civil Rule 83.1 and directed electronic notice to the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the transfer and stated that the order closed the case in the Southern District of New York. The court did not decide the merits of Saamishvili's challenge to his immigration proceedings.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.