Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 4, 2025

Hilda Cecilia Villegas ex rel. Lisual Armando Guzman Andujar v. Francis

Full caption

Hilda Cecilia Villegas ex rel. Lisual Armando Guzman Andujar v. LaDeon Francis, ET AL.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-09199
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Villegas v. Francis, Judge Rochon ordered payment or a fee-waiver application within 30 days, or the case will be dismissed without prejudice.

Who this affects

Hilda Cecilia Villegas, acting as the next friend of Lisual Armando Guzman Andujar, must pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed fee-waiver application within 30 days. If she does not, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The order also denies fee-waiver status for an appeal from this order.

What happened

Hilda Cecilia Villegas, acting for Lisual Armando Guzman Andujar, filed a petition asking the federal court to review the detention under federal law in Villegas v. Francis.

The court ordered Villegas, as the petitioner’s representative, to either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed without paying court fees within 30 days. If she does not comply, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The court did not decide the petition’s underlying claims.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon also ruled that any appeal from this order would not qualify for a fee waiver because it would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hilda Cecilia Villegas ex rel. Lisual Armando Guzman Andujar v. Francis · No. 1:25-cv-09199
Judge
Rochon
Date
Nov. 4, 2025

Background

Hilda Cecilia Villegas, acting as the “next friend”—a person seeking to litigate for another petitioner—filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on behalf of Lisual Armando Guzman Andujar. The opinion does not describe the petition’s underlying detention-related claims.

Filing Fee or Fee-Waiver Application

The court explained that a next friend filing a habeas petition must either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. The petition was submitted without either the fee or the application.

The court ordered the petitioner’s next friend, within 30 days of the order, to pay the $5 fee or complete and submit the attached application. The order gives instructions for payment by mail or in person and directs that any application identify the docket number. It also states that failure to comply within the allowed time will result in dismissal of the action without prejudice, meaning the dismissal does not bar refiling.

Appeal

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Disposition

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued an order directing payment of the filing fee or submission of a fee-waiver application. The order did not reach the merits of the petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.