Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 6, 2025

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Seamless…

Full caption

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO, et al v. Seamless Wall Finishing

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:25-cv-09258
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Drywall Tapers v. Seamless Wall Finishing, Judge Woods ordered briefing and service for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners—Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974, affiliated with the International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO, and the other identified petitioners—and Seamless Wall Finishing.

What happened

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 and other petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Seamless Wall Finishing. The petition was filed on November 5, 2025.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve a legal memorandum, a statement required by Local Civil Rule 56.1, and supporting materials by November 19, 2025. They must serve those materials on Seamless Wall Finishing by November 12 and file proof of service by November 17. The respondent’s opposition is due January 7, 2026, and any reply is due January 21, 2026.

Judge Gregory H. Woods issued a scheduling order, explaining that arbitration-confirmation proceedings are handled much like summary-judgment motions. The order did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Seamless… · No. 1:25-cv-09258
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Nov. 6, 2025

Background

On November 5, 2025, Petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion cites Second Circuit precedent stating that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award should be treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, which is a request for judgment based on the record when there is no genuine dispute requiring a trial.

Order

The court ordered Petitioners to file and serve the following by November 19, 2025:

- a memorandum of law; - a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1; and - any additional supporting materials, including affidavits or declarations stating that the petition’s exhibits are true and correct copies of what they claim to be.

Petitioners must serve the petition and supporting materials on Respondent by November 12, 2025, and file an affidavit confirming service by November 17, 2025. Respondent’s opposition is due January 7, 2026. Petitioners’ reply, if any, is due January 21, 2026.

Result and Effect

The court entered an order setting briefing, supporting-material, and service requirements. It did not grant or deny the petition and did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.