Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 6, 2025

AltWellRX, Inc. v. Topical Biomedics, Inc.

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:25-cv-03276
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
BankruptcyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In AltWellRX v. Topical Biomedics, Judge Halpern dismissed the appeal because the bankruptcy order was not final and no permission for an interlocutory appeal was requested.

Who this affects

AltWellRX, Inc.’s appeal was dismissed, while the underlying bankruptcy proceeding continued with claims, a counterclaim, and cross-claims still pending.

What happened

In AltWellRX, Inc. v. Topical Biomedics, Inc., AltWellRX appealed a Bankruptcy Court order that dismissed its claims against Topical Biomedics, Inc. The District Court considered whether it could hear that appeal.

The District Court found that other claims, a counterclaim, and cross-claims were still pending in the bankruptcy case. Because the Bankruptcy Court’s order did not resolve the entire dispute, it was not a final order that AltWellRX could appeal automatically. AltWellRX also had not asked for permission to appeal the nonfinal order.

Judge Philip M. Halpern dismissed the appeal and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. He stated that permission would be denied even if AltWellRX had requested it because the legal requirements for an interlocutory appeal were not met.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
AltWellRX, Inc. v. Topical Biomedics, Inc. · No. 7:25-cv-03276
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Nov. 6, 2025

Background

AltWellRX, Inc. appealed a Bankruptcy Court order granting Topical Biomedics, Inc.’s motion to dismiss AltWellRX’s claims against it in an underlying adversary proceeding, No. 24-AP-09028-KPY.

The parties advised the District Court that the Bankruptcy Court’s order did not resolve all claims and issues in the adversary proceeding. The matters still pending included AltWellRX’s claims against Commercial Finance Partners, LLC, KeyBank National Association, and the U.S. Small Business Administration; KeyBank National Association’s counterclaim against AltWellRX; and KeyBank National Association’s cross-claims against Topical Biomedics, Inc., Commercial Finance Partners, LLC, and the U.S. Small Business Administration.

Analysis

Under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), a party may appeal a final Bankruptcy Court order as of right. The District Court explained that an order is nonfinal when it does not finally resolve a distinct dispute within the larger bankruptcy case. Because claims, a counterclaim, and cross-claims remained pending, the Bankruptcy Court’s dismissal order was not final under that provision.

A District Court may also allow an interlocutory appeal—an appeal before the Bankruptcy Court has entered a final order—under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(3). The applicable standard comes from 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). AltWellRX had not asked the District Court for permission to pursue an interlocutory appeal. The District Court stated that, even if AltWellRX had made that request, permission would be denied because none of the required § 1292(b) factors was present.

Ruling

Judge Philip M. Halpern dismissed the appeal. The Clerk of Court was respectfully requested to close the case. The opinion does not state that the underlying claims against Topical Biomedics, Inc. were finally resolved by the District Court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.