Herring v. United States of America
Jeffrey Herring v. United States of America; United States of America v. Jeffrey Herring
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:20-cv-09752
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Jeffrey Herring v. United States, Judge Karas entered judgment dismissing Herring’s petition with prejudice and denied a certificate of appealability.
Jeffrey Herring and the United States. Herring’s petition in Case No. 20-CV-9752 was dismissed with prejudice, judgment was entered for the United States, and the civil case was closed.
What happened
Jeffrey Herring filed a petition against the United States in Case No. 20-CV-9752, alongside the related criminal case shown in the caption. The judgment refers to a November 6, 2025 order but does not describe the petition’s claims or that order’s reasoning.
The court dismissed the petition with prejudice, entered judgment for the United States, and closed Case No. 20-CV-9752. It also decided that Herring had not made the required substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied, so it would not issue a certificate of appealability.
Judge Kenneth Karas is identified in the case information. The court also certified that an appeal from the judgment on the merits would not be taken in good faith, meaning the court found that such an appeal would not present a nonfrivolous issue.
The detailed version
- Herring v. United States of America · No. 7:20-cv-09752
- Kenneth Karas
- Nov. 7, 2025
What the judgment says
The judgment concerns Jeffrey Herring’s petition in Case No. 20-CV-9752 and displays the related criminal case, Case No. 16-CR-302, in the caption. It states that the petition was dismissed for the reasons given in the Court’s order dated November 6, 2025. The supplied judgment does not provide the claims raised in the petition or the reasons stated in that earlier order.
Rulings
The court dismissed the petition with prejudice. It entered judgment for the United States in Case No. 20-CV-9752 and closed that case.
The court did not issue a certificate of appealability. A certificate of appealability is a document required for an appeal in certain federal post-conviction proceedings; the court stated that Herring had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied.
The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the judgment on the merits would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not state that an appeal is categorically barred; it records the court’s certification concerning good faith and the absence of a certificate of appealability.
Classification note
This summary classifies the matter as a procedural order because the supplied judgment does not itself explain whether the dismissal reached the petition’s underlying legal claims. The referenced November 6 order, which may contain that information, was not provided. Judge Kenneth Karas is the judge identified in the case information, although the judgment document was entered by the clerk’s office.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.