Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 7, 2025

Herring v. United States of America

Full caption

Jeffrey Herring v. United States of America; United States of America v. Jeffrey Herring

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:20-cv-09752
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCriminalCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jeffrey Herring v. United States, Judge Karas entered judgment dismissing Herring’s petition with prejudice and denied a certificate of appealability.

Who this affects

Jeffrey Herring and the United States. Herring’s petition in Case No. 20-CV-9752 was dismissed with prejudice, judgment was entered for the United States, and the civil case was closed.

What happened

Jeffrey Herring filed a petition against the United States in Case No. 20-CV-9752, alongside the related criminal case shown in the caption. The judgment refers to a November 6, 2025 order but does not describe the petition’s claims or that order’s reasoning.

The court dismissed the petition with prejudice, entered judgment for the United States, and closed Case No. 20-CV-9752. It also decided that Herring had not made the required substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied, so it would not issue a certificate of appealability.

Judge Kenneth Karas is identified in the case information. The court also certified that an appeal from the judgment on the merits would not be taken in good faith, meaning the court found that such an appeal would not present a nonfrivolous issue.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Herring v. United States of America · No. 7:20-cv-09752
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Nov. 7, 2025

What the judgment says

The judgment concerns Jeffrey Herring’s petition in Case No. 20-CV-9752 and displays the related criminal case, Case No. 16-CR-302, in the caption. It states that the petition was dismissed for the reasons given in the Court’s order dated November 6, 2025. The supplied judgment does not provide the claims raised in the petition or the reasons stated in that earlier order.

Rulings

The court dismissed the petition with prejudice. It entered judgment for the United States in Case No. 20-CV-9752 and closed that case.

The court did not issue a certificate of appealability. A certificate of appealability is a document required for an appeal in certain federal post-conviction proceedings; the court stated that Herring had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the judgment on the merits would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not state that an appeal is categorically barred; it records the court’s certification concerning good faith and the absence of a certificate of appealability.

Classification note

This summary classifies the matter as a procedural order because the supplied judgment does not itself explain whether the dismissal reached the petition’s underlying legal claims. The referenced November 6 order, which may contain that information, was not provided. Judge Kenneth Karas is the judge identified in the case information, although the judgment document was entered by the clerk’s office.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.