Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 10, 2025

Zaragoza v. Pappas OG LLC

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:24-cv-08644
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

Alcocer Zaragoza v. Pappas OG LLC: Judge Netburn sets procedures for deciding the plaintiff’s damages.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and Defendant Stratis Morfogen, who must follow the deadlines and submission requirements for the damages inquest; the order may also affect the other named defendants, although it does not impose specific duties on them in the text provided.

What happened

In Jose Ezdrain Alcocer Zaragoza v. Pappas OG LLC et al., the court began a process to determine the plaintiff’s damages after the case was referred for a damages inquest. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or decide liability.

The court ordered the plaintiff to submit proposed factual findings, legal conclusions, affidavits, and other documents within 30 days. The plaintiff must also mail the filings and order to Defendant Stratis Morfogen’s last known address and file proof of service.

Judge Netburn ordered Stratis Morfogen to respond within 30 days after service and said the damages process may be decided from written submissions alone. A party seeking a hearing must explain why one is needed and identify the expected witnesses and evidence.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zaragoza v. Pappas OG LLC · No. 1:24-cv-08644
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Nov. 10, 2025

Nature of the order

This is a scheduling order for a damages inquest. The opinion states that, on November 7, 2025, Judge Lorna G. Schofield referred the case to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn to conduct the inquest and make a report and recommendation concerning Plaintiff’s damages. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims, state whether liability was established, or decide the amount of damages.

Required submissions

The plaintiff must file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law describing the claimed damages and any other requested monetary relief no later than 30 days after the order’s entry. The plaintiff must support each proposed factual finding with affidavits or other documentary evidence and cite the supporting evidence. The filing and exhibits must be submitted electronically under the specified filing category.

The plaintiff must also serve a complete copy of the filing and the order by mail to Defendant Stratis Morfogen’s last known address, then file a certificate of service with the court.

Response by Stratis Morfogen

Stratis Morfogen may respond no later than 30 days after service. His response must address each proposed finding of fact and conclusion of law. He may also submit counter-findings and counter-conclusions, supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence, with citations for each proposed factual finding.

Possible hearing

The court notified the parties that it may conduct the damages inquest based solely on written submissions. A party seeking an evidentiary hearing must explain why the inquest should not proceed on written submissions alone and describe the witnesses and evidence that would be presented. The order also requires courtesy copies of filings as required by Judge Netburn’s individual practices.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.