Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 12, 2025

Paguandas v. Rikers Island DOC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-07064
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Livingston Paguandas v. Rikers Island DOC; Bob Barker Company Inc., Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied appeal fee-waiver status.

Who this affects

Livingston Paguandas’s action was dismissed. The judgment also affects any appeal by denying permission to proceed without paying filing fees; the defendants are Rikers Island DOC and Bob Barker Company Inc.

What happened

In Livingston Paguandas v. Rikers Island DOC; Bob Barker Company Inc., the court dismissed the action. The judgment says the reasons were explained in a November 10, 2025, order, which is not included here.

The court also determined that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Livingston Paguandas permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on November 12, 2025. The judgment does not state the grounds for dismissing the action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Paguandas v. Rikers Island DOC · No. 1:25-cv-07064
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 12, 2025

Disposition

The court dismissed the action. The judgment states that the reasons for dismissal were given in the court’s November 10, 2025, order, but that order is not included in the provided text.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status—that is, permission to pursue an appeal without paying the required filing fees—for purposes of an appeal.

What the Provided Text Does Not Establish

The judgment does not explain the claims, the parties’ arguments, or the specific legal basis for dismissal. It also does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.