Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 13, 2025

Curry v. Theos

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:24-cv-04603
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In John Curry v. John Theos, Judge Woods ordered attendance at two conferences and warned that nonattendance could lead to dismissal.

Who this affects

John Curry, and defense counsel for John Theos, Odani Acevedo, and Thomas Accomando, must attend the two scheduled conferences. The warning specifically concerns Curry’s claims against Theos, Acevedo, and Accomando.

What happened

In John Curry v. John Theos, a conference about three defendants’ proposed request to dismiss the case was held on November 12, 2025, but John Curry did not attend.

The court scheduled additional conferences for December 1 and December 8, 2025, and ordered Curry and the defendants’ lawyer to attend both in person. The court warned that if Curry misses both conferences, it will dismiss his claims against John Theos, Odani Acevedo, and Thomas Accomando for not pursuing the case.

Judge Gregory H. Woods issued the order on November 13, 2025. The order did not itself dismiss any claims; it set conferences and warned of a possible future dismissal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Curry v. Theos · No. 1:24-cv-04603
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Nov. 13, 2025

Background

The court had scheduled a November 12, 2025 conference to discuss a proposed motion to dismiss by Defendants John Theos, Odani Acevedo, and Thomas Accomando. The court, its staff, and defense counsel attended, but Plaintiff John Curry did not.

Order

The court scheduled two additional status conferences in Courtroom 12C of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

- December 1, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. - December 8, 2025, at 3:00 p.m.

The court ordered Curry and defense counsel to attend both conferences personally. It warned that failure to follow court orders may result in sanctions. Specifically, if Curry does not attend both conferences, the court will dismiss his claims against Theos, Acevedo, and Accomando for failure to prosecute, meaning failure to continue pursuing the case.

Disposition

Judge Gregory H. Woods did not dismiss the claims in this order. The order scheduled the two conferences, imposed an attendance requirement, and warned of a possible future dismissal if Curry misses both conferences. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Curry a copy of the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.