Toikach v. Dior

Document and request

The supplied text is a November 12, 2025 letter from Mylan L. Denerstein to Judge John G. Koeltl. The letter says the parties requested an adjournment, meaning a postponement, of the initial case-management conference scheduled for November 20, 2025. It states that plaintiff’s counsel consented and that this was the parties’ first request for an adjournment.

Reasons given

The letter describes a pending motion filed in a related action seeking to consolidate this case and other related actions, appoint proposed interim class counsel and an executive committee, stay this case and defendants’ deadlines to respond, and require a consolidated class-action complaint in the proposed lead case. It also describes a pending motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to transfer and centralize this case and other actions in a proposed multidistrict proceeding in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The panel was scheduled to hear argument on December 4, 2025.

The parties asked that the conference be postponed until after the panel ruled on the transfer-and-centralization motion. They stated that the postponement would promote efficiency and conserve resources. They also agreed to file a joint status report within one week of the earlier of the panel’s decision or a ruling on the consolidation motion.

Court action

The supplied text does not state that Judge John G. Koeltl granted, denied, or otherwise ruled on the request. It is therefore not a court disposition of the case or motion.