Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 13, 2025

Santander v. Mister Buy Corp

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:25-cv-06437
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Santander v. Mister Buy, Judge Gorenstein required a filing explaining whether the proposed Fair Labor Standards Act settlement is fair and reasonable.

Who this affects

The parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act case, including Luis Geovany Santander and the defendants, must provide the required settlement-review materials.

What happened

Luis Geovany Santander v. Mister Buy Corp et al. includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the parties proposed a settlement.

The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter or motion by December 1, 2025, addressing whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. The filing must discuss the claims and defenses, potential damages, the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s case, the negotiation process, attorney fees, expenses, and the settlement agreement itself.

Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein issued the order on November 13, 2025. The order requires information for reviewing the proposed settlement; it does not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Santander v. Mister Buy Corp · No. 1:25-cv-06437
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
Nov. 13, 2025

Background

The case contains one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The opinion states that the parties proposed a settlement. Because settlements of these claims require court review under the cited precedent, the court required the parties to provide information about the proposed resolution.

Required filing

The parties must file a joint letter or motion by December 1, 2025. The filing must address whether the settlement is fair and reasonable and discuss:

- the claims and defenses; - the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; - the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiff’s case and the defendants’ defenses; - any factors explaining a difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount; - the litigation and negotiation process; and - other issues relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including the collectability of a judgment if the case proceeded to trial.

The filing must also disclose the attorney-fee arrangement, include the retainer agreement, and provide information about actual attorney fees incurred. Requests for costs or expenses other than the filing fee must be supported by copies of invoices. The parties must attach the settlement agreement.

Disposition

Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein ordered the parties to file the joint letter or motion and the required supporting materials. The opinion does not say that the court approved or rejected the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.