Garcia v. New York State Department of Corrections
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-08557
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Robert Summa; Angel Garcia v. New York State Department of Corrections, Judge Swain ordered Garcia to submit an original signature within 30 days.
Angel Garcia must submit the original signature page within 30 days or be dismissed from the action. The order also affects the plaintiffs’ ability to appeal without paying filing costs.
What happened
Robert Summa and Angel Garcia sued the New York State Department of Corrections and other defendants without lawyers. The court said Garcia had not signed the complaint.
The court ordered Garcia to send the complaint’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days. No summons will be issued for now, and Garcia will be dismissed from the case if he does not comply.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing costs.
The detailed version
- Garcia v. New York State Department of Corrections · No. 1:25-cv-08557
- Laura Swain
- Oct. 14, 2025
Background
Robert Summa and Angel Garcia brought this action without lawyers. The complaint identified the New York State Department of Corrections and other defendants. The court stated that Garcia had not signed the complaint.
Signature Requirement
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) requires every pleading, motion, and other court filing to be signed by a lawyer of record or, when a party has no lawyer, by that party personally. The court explained that this requires a handwritten signature or a handplaced mark.
The court directed Garcia to submit the complaint’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days of the order. A copy of the signature page was attached. The court stated that no summons would issue at that time. If Garcia complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, he would be dismissed from the action.
Appeal-Filing-Cost Ruling
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Garcia’s and Summa’s ability to appeal without paying the filing costs for that appeal.
Disposition
The court entered an order directing Garcia to provide an original signature and denied permission to appeal without paying filing costs. The order did not decide the underlying civil-rights claims.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.