Morgan v. NYC Department of Corrections
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-09151
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Durran Morgan v. NYC Department of Corrections, Judge Swain ordered Morgan to pay fees or submit applications to proceed without prepayment.
Durran Morgan, the incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer; the action will be dismissed if the required fees or documents are not submitted within 30 days.
What happened
Durran Morgan v. NYC Department of Corrections concerns a civil action brought by Morgan, who is incarcerated and representing himself. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.
The court gave Morgan 30 days to pay $405 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization allows installment payments from his account and requires six months of account statements. If Morgan does not comply, the action will be dismissed; no answer from the defendants was required at this stage.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered these filing steps and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal from the order, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The court did not decide the merits of Morgan’s claims.
The detailed version
- Morgan v. NYC Department of Corrections · No. 1:25-cv-09151
- Laura Swain
- Nov. 17, 2025
Background
Durran Morgan filed a civil action against NYC Department of Corrections et al. Morgan is incarcerated at Rikers Island, Robert N. Davoren Complex, and is proceeding without a lawyer. The opinion does not describe the claims in the complaint.
Filing-fee requirement
The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $405 in fees—$350 for the filing fee and $55 for the administrative fee—or request permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without prepaying the fees. A prisoner seeking IFP status must submit a signed IFP application and a prisoner authorization. The authorization permits the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account and requires certified account statements for the previous six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted IFP status.
Morgan submitted the complaint without the fees, a completed IFP application, or a prisoner authorization. The court ordered Morgan, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $405 or submit the IFP application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 25-CV-9151.
Effect of the order
No answer from the defendants was required at that time. If Morgan complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If Morgan does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.
The court also cautioned that a later dismissal of a prisoner’s federal civil action or appeal as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim can count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). After three strikes, a prisoner generally cannot file new federal civil actions IFP unless under imminent danger of serious physical injury and must pay filing fees when filing a new action. The court did not rule on the merits of Morgan’s claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.