Blast Off Media Inc. v. Downtown Music Capital
Blast Off Media Inc. v. Downtown Music Capital, LLC, Downtown Music LLC, and Downtown Music Holdings LLC
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:25-cv-09363
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Blast Off Media v. Downtown Music, Judge Engelmayer ordered an amended complaint identifying LLC members’ citizenship or possible dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
Blast Off Media Inc. must provide additional information about the citizenship of the defendants’ LLC members to establish federal jurisdiction; the defendants and the case’s continued presence in federal court are also affected.
What happened
Blast Off Media Inc. v. Downtown Music Capital, LLC, Downtown Music LLC, and Downtown Music Holdings LLC concerns the information needed to establish federal jurisdiction based on the parties’ citizenship. Blast Off alleged that the defendants were Delaware limited liability companies with principal places of business in New York, but did not identify the citizenship of their members.
The court explained that a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members. It therefore gave Blast Off permission to file an amended complaint identifying the citizenship of each individual member and the incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate member.
By November 24, 2025, Blast Off must file the amended complaint. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer stated that if Blast Off cannot truthfully allege complete diversity, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.
The detailed version
- Blast Off Media Inc. v. Downtown Music Capital · No. 1:25-cv-09363
- Paul Engelmayer
- Nov. 17, 2025
Background
Blast Off Media Inc. filed a complaint asserting that diversity of citizenship was the sole basis for federal jurisdiction. The complaint alleged that Downtown Music Capital, LLC, Downtown Music LLC, and Downtown Music Holdings LLC were Delaware limited liability companies with principal places of business in New York. It did not allege the citizenship of each defendant’s members.
Jurisdictional Deficiency
For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members. The court therefore could not determine from the complaint whether complete diversity existed—meaning that the relevant parties had the citizenship required for federal jurisdiction.
Order
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), the court granted Blast Off leave to amend its complaint by November 24, 2025. The amended complaint must identify, for each defendant, the citizenship of every individual member and the place of incorporation and principal place of business of every corporate member. If Blast Off cannot truthfully allege complete diversity based on that information, the court stated that the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer did not rule on the merits of the underlying dispute.
The order also stated that a separate order would address Blast Off’s request to continue sealing limited portions of the complaint and exhibits. The court authorized public redactions for any sealed materials that reappear in the amended filing, with unredacted versions filed under seal, subject to the separate sealing order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.