Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Nov. 18, 2025

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York v. AMCC Industries Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-11142
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
7
ArbitrationErisaSummary JudgmentContract
In one sentence

In Trustees v. AMCC Industries, Judge Vyskocil confirmed an arbitration award and granted related fees and interest.

Who this affects

The petitioners—trustees of the identified funds and the Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York—obtained a judgment against AMCC Industries Inc. for $7,973.80, plus $2,346 in attorney fees and costs and the specified pre- and post-judgment interest.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, et al. v. AMCC Industries Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against AMCC Industries Inc. The dispute arose from agreements requiring AMCC to make payments to benefit funds and provide records for auditing.

The arbitrator awarded the petitioners $7,973.80 after an audit and arbitration hearing. AMCC participated in the arbitration but did not respond to the federal court petition. The petitioners also requested attorney fees, costs, and interest connected with enforcing the award.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil granted the petition, confirmed the $7,973.80 award, awarded $2,346 in attorney fees and costs, and granted interest at 6.75% through the date of judgment, followed by statutory post-judgment interest until payment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:23-cv-11142
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Nov. 18, 2025

Background

The petitioners were trustees of employee-benefit funds and a charitable organization, along with the Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York. AMCC Industries Inc. assented to a Project Labor Agreement that incorporated a collective bargaining agreement and a policy governing employer contributions. Those agreements required AMCC to contribute money to the funds, provide books and payroll records for auditing, and arbitrate disputes.

The petitioners audited AMCC’s records for the period from October 7, 2019, through March 27, 2022. They alleged that AMCC did not pay amounts assessed after the audit, the audit cost, or related legal fees. After arbitration, the arbitrator issued a December 27, 2022 award totaling $7,973.80. The award included a principal deficiency, interest, liquidated damages, promotional fund contributions, non-audit interest, court costs, attorney fees, the arbitrator’s fee, and audit costs. The arbitrator also ordered interest at 6.75% annually from December 27, 2022. The opinion states that AMCC attended the arbitration and agreed with the auditor’s findings and the amounts owed.

Court’s Review

The petitioners served AMCC with the petition on December 29, 2023. AMCC did not appear or respond. The petitioners asked the court to treat the unanswered petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. The court explained that summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute about a material fact and the requesting party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

For an arbitration award, the court’s review is limited. The court does not replace the arbitrator’s interpretation of the facts or contract with its own. Instead, it asks whether the arbitrator acted within the authority granted by the collective bargaining agreement and whether the award has at least a minimally supportable justification.

Rulings

The court found that the arbitrator acted within the authority granted by the collective bargaining agreement, considered the agreement and auditor’s testimony, and provided more than the required minimally supportable justification. Because AMCC offered no basis to challenge the award, the court granted the petition to confirm the arbitration award.

The court also awarded the petitioners $2,346 in attorney fees and costs for the federal court action. It found those amounts reasonable and relied on the agreements’ provisions allowing recovery of attorney fees and costs when the funds enforce delinquent contributions or an arbitration award. The court granted pre-judgment interest at 6.75% annually from December 27, 2022, through the date of judgment. It also awarded post-judgment interest at the statutory rate from entry of judgment until AMCC pays the full award. The court requested that the Clerk enter judgment and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 7-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.