FIDENCIO CANO ARMENTA v. SINGAPORE GRILL NY INC., et al.
- James Oetken
- 1:24-cv-01261
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Fidencio Cano Armenta v. Singapore Grill NY Inc., Judge Wang approved the proposed settlement as fair and reasonable and ordered the case closed.
The plaintiff, Fidencio Cano Armenta, and the defendants, Singapore Grill NY Inc. and the other named defendants, were affected by approval of the proposed settlement and closure of the case.
What happened
In Fidencio Cano Armenta v. Singapore Grill NY Inc., the court reviewed the parties’ proposed settlement submission.
The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms. It states only that the parties submitted the proposed settlement for court review.
Judge Ona T. Wang found the proposed settlement fair and reasonable. She directed the Clerk of Court to close the settlement filing and then close the case.
The detailed version
- FIDENCIO CANO ARMENTA v. SINGAPORE GRILL NY INC., et al. · No. 1:24-cv-01261
- James Oetken
- Nov. 18, 2025
Background
The parties submitted a proposed settlement for the court’s review. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide the settlement’s terms.
Court’s Analysis
The court reviewed the settlement submission under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., a Second Circuit decision concerning judicial review of certain employment settlements. The court found that the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable. The opinion does not provide further reasons for that conclusion.
Disposition
Judge Ona T. Wang directed the Clerk of Court to close ECF No. 136 and then close the case. The order approved the proposed settlement as fair and reasonable and closed the matter; it did not decide the underlying claims on their merits.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.