Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v…
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journey Man Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al. v. Rennon Construction Corp.
- Ho
- 1:25-cv-09518
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Rennon Construction Corp., Judge Ho set deadlines for an arbitration-confirmation petition.
The petitioners seeking confirmation of the arbitration award and Rennon Construction Corp., the respondent.
What happened
In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Rennon Construction Corp., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion does not say whether the award should be confirmed.
The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by December 9, 2025. The respondent may oppose by January 6, 2025, and the petitioners may reply by January 13, 2025. The petitioners also had to serve the petition, supporting papers, and order under Rule 4 by November 25, 2025, and file proof of service.
Judge Dale E. Ho issued this scheduling order and required the parties to proceed before the court considers the confirmation request.
The detailed version
- Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:25-cv-09518
- Ho
- Nov. 18, 2025
Background
On November 14, 2025, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, meaning the court may consider supporting materials when deciding whether confirmation is appropriate.
Order
The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by December 9, 2025. The respondent's opposition, if any, was listed as due January 6, 2025, and the petitioners' reply, if any, was listed as due January 13, 2025.
The petitioners also had to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondent under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by November 25, 2025. They were required to file an affidavit confirming service with the court by that date.
Disposition
The court issued a scheduling and service order. It did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award. The order was signed by United States District Judge Dale E. Ho.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.