Castillo v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine Inc.
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:24-cv-00984
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Castillo v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Judge Engelmayer directed public filing of redacted exhibits before reviewing Castillo’s sealing request.
Rinaldys Castillo and the individuals whose identifying information appears in the exhibits; the defendants designated some materials as confidential.
What happened
Rinaldys Castillo asked the court to let the plaintiff file unredacted exhibits under seal and publicly file redacted versions. The exhibits were attached to a declaration supporting a motion for conditional certification.
The court did not yet decide whether the exhibits should be sealed. It directed Castillo to publicly file the redacted exhibits, as required by the court’s rules.
After that filing, the court will review the sealing request, ordered by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.
The detailed version
- Castillo v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00984
- Paul Engelmayer
- Nov. 19, 2025
Background
Plaintiff Rinaldys Castillo asked to file under seal an unredacted version of exhibits attached to Jeremiah Frei-Pearson’s declaration supporting the plaintiff’s motion for conditional certification. Castillo also sought to publicly file a redacted version. The request stated that defendants had designated some of the materials as confidential and that the proposed redactions concerned identifying information for individuals affected by the lawsuit. Castillo took no position on whether defendants had properly designated the materials and reserved the right to challenge those designations.
Court’s action
The court observed that Castillo had already publicly filed the relevant declaration, with some exhibits attached and the exhibits covered by the sealing request omitted and marked as filed under seal. Because Castillo sought to file redacted exhibits rather than seal the exhibits entirely, the court directed Castillo to publicly file the redacted versions as required by the court’s Individual Rules.
What happens next
The court did not grant or deny the sealing request in this order. It stated that, after the redacted exhibits are publicly filed, it will review the motion to seal. The order was signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.