Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 19, 2025

Castillo v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:24-cv-00984
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Castillo v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Judge Engelmayer directed public filing of redacted exhibits before reviewing Castillo’s sealing request.

Who this affects

Rinaldys Castillo and the individuals whose identifying information appears in the exhibits; the defendants designated some materials as confidential.

What happened

Rinaldys Castillo asked the court to let the plaintiff file unredacted exhibits under seal and publicly file redacted versions. The exhibits were attached to a declaration supporting a motion for conditional certification.

The court did not yet decide whether the exhibits should be sealed. It directed Castillo to publicly file the redacted exhibits, as required by the court’s rules.

After that filing, the court will review the sealing request, ordered by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Castillo v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00984
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Nov. 19, 2025

Background

Plaintiff Rinaldys Castillo asked to file under seal an unredacted version of exhibits attached to Jeremiah Frei-Pearson’s declaration supporting the plaintiff’s motion for conditional certification. Castillo also sought to publicly file a redacted version. The request stated that defendants had designated some of the materials as confidential and that the proposed redactions concerned identifying information for individuals affected by the lawsuit. Castillo took no position on whether defendants had properly designated the materials and reserved the right to challenge those designations.

Court’s action

The court observed that Castillo had already publicly filed the relevant declaration, with some exhibits attached and the exhibits covered by the sealing request omitted and marked as filed under seal. Because Castillo sought to file redacted exhibits rather than seal the exhibits entirely, the court directed Castillo to publicly file the redacted versions as required by the court’s Individual Rules.

What happens next

The court did not grant or deny the sealing request in this order. It stated that, after the redacted exhibits are publicly filed, it will review the motion to seal. The order was signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.