Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 18, 2025

Izeh v. The Ambassador of Nigeria to the United States of America

Full caption

Dr. Matthew Izeh v. The Ambassador of Nigeria to the United States of America, et al.

Judge
Kimba Wood
Docket
1:25-cv-03975
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Izeh v. Ambassador of Nigeria, Judge Wood barred Dr. Matthew Izeh from filing future civil actions without prior permission when seeking to proceed without paying fees.

Who this affects

Dr. Matthew Izeh is barred from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in this court unless he first obtains permission, and the court directed entry of judgment dismissing this action.

What happened

In Dr. Matthew Izeh v. The Ambassador of Nigeria to the United States of America, et al., the court had previously dismissed Izeh’s action as barred by diplomatic immunity and as frivolous. Izeh was representing himself.

The court said Izeh had filed a dozen other cases that had been dismissed as frivolous, lacking merit, duplicative, or for failure to follow court orders. The court ordered him to explain why he should not be barred from filing future cases without paying filing fees unless he first obtained permission, but he did not file the required declaration.

Judge Kimba M. Wood barred Izeh from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in this court unless he first obtains permission. The court also directed entry of judgment dismissing this action and denied fee-free status for any appeal because it would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Izeh v. The Ambassador of Nigeria to the United States of America · No. 1:25-cv-03975
Judge
Kimba Wood
Date
Nov. 18, 2025

Background

Dr. Matthew Izeh filed the action without a lawyer. On July 16, 2025, the court dismissed the action as barred by diplomatic immunity and as frivolous. The court also noted that Izeh had filed a dozen other cases that had been dismissed as frivolous, lacking merit, duplicative, or for failure to comply with court orders.

The court ordered Izeh to submit a declaration within 30 days explaining why he should not be barred from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees unless he first obtained the court’s permission. Izeh did not submit the required declaration. The opinion states that the first mailing of the order to show cause was returned to the court, but that the court confirmed Izeh’s address and resent the order; the second mailing was not returned.

Rulings

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, the court barred Izeh from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in the Southern District of New York unless he first obtains permission. Any motion seeking permission must include a copy of the proposed complaint and a copy of the bar order, and it must be filed with the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit. The court stated that it will dismiss any action Izeh files without first submitting the required motion for permission.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the bar order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied fee-free status for an appeal. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing this action. Judge Kimba M. Wood signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.