Izeh v. The Ambassador of Nigeria to the United States of America
Dr. Matthew Izeh v. The Ambassador of Nigeria to the United States of America, et al.
- Kimba Wood
- 1:25-cv-03975
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Izeh v. Ambassador of Nigeria, Judge Wood barred Dr. Matthew Izeh from filing future civil actions without prior permission when seeking to proceed without paying fees.
Dr. Matthew Izeh is barred from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in this court unless he first obtains permission, and the court directed entry of judgment dismissing this action.
What happened
In Dr. Matthew Izeh v. The Ambassador of Nigeria to the United States of America, et al., the court had previously dismissed Izeh’s action as barred by diplomatic immunity and as frivolous. Izeh was representing himself.
The court said Izeh had filed a dozen other cases that had been dismissed as frivolous, lacking merit, duplicative, or for failure to follow court orders. The court ordered him to explain why he should not be barred from filing future cases without paying filing fees unless he first obtained permission, but he did not file the required declaration.
Judge Kimba M. Wood barred Izeh from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in this court unless he first obtains permission. The court also directed entry of judgment dismissing this action and denied fee-free status for any appeal because it would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Izeh v. The Ambassador of Nigeria to the United States of America · No. 1:25-cv-03975
- Kimba Wood
- Nov. 18, 2025
Background
Dr. Matthew Izeh filed the action without a lawyer. On July 16, 2025, the court dismissed the action as barred by diplomatic immunity and as frivolous. The court also noted that Izeh had filed a dozen other cases that had been dismissed as frivolous, lacking merit, duplicative, or for failure to comply with court orders.
The court ordered Izeh to submit a declaration within 30 days explaining why he should not be barred from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees unless he first obtained the court’s permission. Izeh did not submit the required declaration. The opinion states that the first mailing of the order to show cause was returned to the court, but that the court confirmed Izeh’s address and resent the order; the second mailing was not returned.
Rulings
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, the court barred Izeh from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in the Southern District of New York unless he first obtains permission. Any motion seeking permission must include a copy of the proposed complaint and a copy of the bar order, and it must be filed with the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit. The court stated that it will dismiss any action Izeh files without first submitting the required motion for permission.
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the bar order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied fee-free status for an appeal. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing this action. Judge Kimba M. Wood signed the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.