Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 18, 2025

Haxhaj v. A&E Properties II Mgmt

Full caption

Hakim Haxhaj v. A&E Properties II Mgmt, LLC; A&E Real Estate Holdings LLC; GGTA (Glenn Gardens Tenants Association) Inc.

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:25-cv-05423
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hakim Haxhaj v. A&E Properties II Mgmt, LLC, Judge Stein ordered the parties to discuss consenting to his handling of future proceedings.

Who this affects

Hakim Haxhaj and the defendants—A&E Properties II Mgmt, LLC; A&E Real Estate Holdings LLC; and GGTA (Glenn Gardens Tenants Association) Inc.—were required to discuss whether to consent to further proceedings before Magistrate Judge Gary Stein.

What happened

In Hakim Haxhaj v. A&E Properties II Mgmt, LLC, Haxhaj asked the court to approve the parties’ settlement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

The court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would voluntarily consent to having Magistrate Judge Gary Stein conduct all remaining proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment. If both sides consent, defense counsel must submit the completed consent form by November 28, 2025.

Judge Stein did not decide whether to approve the settlement or resolve the case. He issued only the order requiring the parties to discuss consent to magistrate-judge proceedings.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Haxhaj v. A&E Properties II Mgmt · No. 1:25-cv-05423
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
Nov. 18, 2025

Background

The court received Plaintiff Hakim Haxhaj’s motion seeking approval of the parties’ settlement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The opinion does not state the underlying claims, the settlement terms, or whether any party opposed the settlement.

Order

To potentially conserve resources, promote efficiency, and speed the case’s resolution, the court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having Magistrate Judge Gary Stein conduct all further proceedings. This consent would allow the magistrate judge to handle the case, including any trial and entry of final judgment, instead of Judge Ho.

If both sides consent, defense counsel must submit a fully completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form by November 28, 2025. The court would then decide whether to approve the form. Consent is voluntary, and the attached information sheet states that withholding consent has no adverse substantive consequences and that the identity of a party withholding consent will not be disclosed to the judge who might otherwise handle the case.

Disposition

The order did not approve or deny the settlement motion, enter judgment, or decide the underlying dispute. It ordered the parties to discuss consent to magistrate-judge proceedings. The order states that any appeal from a later final judgment entered in this court would go directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.