Atlantic Specialty Ins. Co. v. Allied Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. et al.
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:25-cv-08701
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Atlantic Specialty v. Allied Gaming, Judge Schofield ordered Atlantic to respond to Allied’s request concerning a proposed coverage motion and discovery stay.
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company must file a response of no more than three pages by November 25, 2025. Allied’s requests for a pre-motion conference and a discovery stay, and its proposed partial summary-judgment motion, were not decided in the provided order.
What happened
Atlantic Specialty Ins. Co. v. Allied Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. concerns insurance coverage for the “Yellow River Action,” a shareholder lawsuit involving Allied. Allied says that action arose from a different transaction than an earlier lawsuit and therefore is covered under Atlantic’s policy.
Allied asked the court to hold a conference about a planned partial summary-judgment motion and to pause discovery while that motion is considered. Allied argued that the coverage issue could be decided from the policy and the complaints in the two underlying lawsuits. The opinion text reflects Allied’s arguments and does not decide whether coverage exists.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered Atlantic to file a response of no more than three pages by November 25, 2025. The order did not state whether the court would hold the requested conference, pause discovery, or grant any future summary-judgment motion.
The detailed version
- Atlantic Specialty Ins. Co. v. Allied Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. et al. · No. 1:25-cv-08701
- Lorna Schofield
- Nov. 19, 2025
Nature of the Document
The provided text is a letter from Allied Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and other defendants, together with Judge Schofield’s brief scheduling order. It is not a decision on the insurance-coverage dispute.
Background
Allied purchased a directors-and-officers primary policy from XL Specialty Insurance Company in 2023. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company issued an excess policy with $5 million in limits for the period from August 23, 2024, through August 23, 2025. The excess policy follows the primary policy and includes provisions concerning claims arising from related wrongful acts and claims previously noticed under an earlier policy.
The letter states that Atlantic denied coverage for the “Yellow River Action,” a shareholder lawsuit arising from an October 2024 transaction in which Yellow River purchased Allied shares and received other rights. Atlantic allegedly contended that the action involved wrongful acts related to those alleged in an earlier “Elite Action,” which concerned a different transaction in December 2023. Allied disputes that the two lawsuits involve related wrongful acts and maintains that the Yellow River Action is covered under Atlantic’s policy.
Allied’s Request
Allied asked the court to hold a pre-motion conference regarding an anticipated motion for partial summary judgment. Allied also asked the court to stay, or pause, discovery while that motion is considered. Allied argued that the interrelatedness issue could be resolved as a matter of law by comparing the policy language with the complaints in the two underlying lawsuits, without additional factual discovery.
Allied further argued that the policy’s prior-notice exclusion does not apply because the Yellow River Action was filed on November 12, 2024, after the Atlantic policy began on August 23, 2024. These statements describe Allied’s position; the court did not decide them in this order.
Court’s Action
Judge Schofield ordered Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company to file a response of no more than three pages by November 25, 2025. The order does not state that the court granted or denied Allied’s request for a pre-motion conference, its request to stay discovery, or any anticipated motion for partial summary judgment. The insurance-coverage dispute therefore remained unresolved in the provided text.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.