Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2025

Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Germany GmbH, et al.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:24-cv-04337
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Regal Games v. SellerX Germany, Judge Broderick ordered defendants to choose whether their pending dismissal motion was moot or should be evaluated.

Who this affects

Regal Games and the defendants are affected. Defendants must tell the court whether they want the pending motion to dismiss treated as moot or evaluated under the amended complaint.

What happened

In Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Germany GmbH, et al., Regal Games filed an amended complaint on November 19, 2025, while defendants’ motion to dismiss was still pending.

The court explained that, after a proper amendment, it could either treat the pending motion as moot or evaluate it using the amended complaint’s allegations.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered defendants to file a letter by November 26, 2025, stating which option they preferred. The court did not decide the motion to dismiss in this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Germany GmbH, et al. · No. 1:24-cv-04337
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Nov. 20, 2025

Background

On November 19, 2025, Regal Games filed an amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). Defendants had already filed a motion to dismiss, and that motion was still pending.

Court’s analysis

The court stated that when a plaintiff properly amends a complaint while a motion to dismiss remains pending, the court may either deny the pending motion as moot or evaluate the motion based on the allegations in the amended complaint.

Order

The court ordered defendants to file a letter by November 26, 2025, choosing whether the pending motion to dismiss should be treated as moot, without prejudice to filing a new motion under Rule 15(a)(3), or whether the court should evaluate the existing motion using the amended complaint. The order did not rule on the merits of the motion to dismiss.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.