Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2025

Cranford v. Rikers Island DOC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-07066
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Richard Cranford v. Rikers Island DOC, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Richard Cranford’s action was dismissed. The judgment also affects his ability to appeal without paying filing fees; the defendants are Rikers Island DOC and Bob Barker Company, Inc.

What happened

Richard Cranford sued Rikers Island DOC and Bob Barker Company, Inc. The opinion gives no details about the claims or the events leading to the lawsuit.

The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in a November 12, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included here, so this judgment does not explain the dismissal’s basis.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Richard Cranford permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cranford v. Rikers Island DOC · No. 1:25-cv-07066
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 20, 2025

Background

Richard Cranford brought this action against Rikers Island DOC and Bob Barker Company, Inc. The judgment does not describe the claims, the alleged facts, or the parties’ arguments. It refers to a November 12, 2025, order for the reasons supporting dismissal, but that order is not included in the provided text.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. As a result, the court denied in forma pauperis status for an appeal, meaning it denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on November 20, 2025.

Scope of the Provided Opinion

Because the November 12 order is not provided, the judgment does not reveal whether the dismissal was based on the claims’ substance, a procedural issue, or another ground.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.