Center for Constitutional Rights v. U.S. Department of State et al.
- Katherine Failla
- 1:25-cv-06879
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Center for Constitutional Rights v. U.S. Department of State, Judge Failla granted the request to postpone the initial conference and ordered 45-day status updates.
Center for Constitutional Rights, the U.S. Department of State, and the U.S. Agency for International Development; the order also sets reporting obligations for all parties.
What happened
Center for Constitutional Rights brought this Freedom of Information Act case against the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development. The parties told the court that the case did not require an initial conference or discovery at that time.
The court granted the application and postponed the initial pretrial conference scheduled for November 21, 2025, without setting a new date. The parties must jointly update the court every 45 days, with the first update due January 5, 2026. The clerk was also directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 18.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla entered this scheduling order on November 21, 2025. The order did not decide the parties’ underlying Freedom of Information Act dispute.
The detailed version
- Center for Constitutional Rights v. U.S. Department of State et al. · No. 1:25-cv-06879
- Katherine Failla
- Nov. 21, 2025
Background
Center for Constitutional Rights sued the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development under the Freedom of Information Act, a federal law that generally allows people to request records from federal agencies. The Government, representing both agency defendants, submitted a letter at the direction of the court and on behalf of all parties.
The parties explained that they were scheduled for an initial pretrial conference on November 21, 2025. They stated that this type of case is exempt from initial disclosures and the required meeting about discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. They also said they expected the matter to be resolved either by agreement or through motions for summary judgment, without discovery. The parties proposed continuing to discuss the records request and sending the court a joint progress report every 45 days.
Court’s Action
The court granted the application. It adjourned, or postponed without setting a new date, the initial pretrial conference previously scheduled for November 21, 2025. The parties were ordered to provide a joint status update about the case’s progress every 45 days. The first update letter is due January 5, 2026.
The clerk was directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 18. The opinion does not identify the nature of that motion. The court did not rule on the underlying records dispute, the Government’s responses, or any future summary-judgment motion.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.