Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 24, 2025

Davis v. The Legal Aid Society

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:25-cv-08242
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Davis v. The Legal Aid Society, Judge Furman granted a request to move the initial pretrial conference from January 13 to January 20, 2026.

Who this affects

The plaintiff, the defendants, and their attorneys are affected by the rescheduled initial pretrial conference.

What happened

Davis v. The Legal Aid Society concerns a request to postpone the case’s initial pretrial conference, which was scheduled for January 13, 2026.

The plaintiff’s lawyer asked for a brief postponement because he would be outside the country from January 5 through January 19, 2026. Lawyers for both defendants agreed, and the lawyers said they were available from January 20 through January 23.

Judge Jesse M. Furman granted the request. The conference was moved to January 20, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., and the court directed that ECF No. 14 be terminated.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Davis v. The Legal Aid Society · No. 1:25-cv-08242
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Nov. 24, 2025

Background

The plaintiff’s counsel asked the court to briefly postpone the initial pretrial conference. The conference was scheduled for January 13, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Counsel stated that he would be out of the country from January 5 through January 19, 2026. He also stated that there had been no earlier postponement requests, that counsel for both defendants consented, and that the attorneys were available from January 20 through January 23.

Ruling

Judge Jesse M. Furman granted the request. The initial pretrial conference was moved to January 20, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. The court also directed that ECF No. 14 be terminated. The order addressed scheduling only and did not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.