Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 24, 2025

SolarKal, LLC v. Holt Gollatz, doing business as New World Strategies, LLC

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:25-cv-09656
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

SolarKal v. Holt Gollatz was dismissed for inadequate diversity allegations; Judge Woods ruled the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction.

Who this affects

SolarKal, LLC's action against Holt Gollatz, doing business as New World Strategies, LLC; the case was closed after dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

What happened

SolarKal, LLC sued Holt Gollatz, doing business as New World Strategies, LLC, and claimed that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction because the parties were from different states and more than $75,000 was at stake.

The court explained that limited liability companies are citizens of every state where their members are citizens. SolarKal's response identified the companies as New York and Pennsylvania limited liability companies but did not identify the citizenship of any member of either company.

The court dismissed the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and directed the Clerk of Court to close it. Judge Gregory H. Woods also directed SolarKal to serve the order on Holt Gollatz and keep proof of service.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
SolarKal, LLC v. Holt Gollatz, doing business as New World Strategies, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-09656
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Nov. 24, 2025

Background

SolarKal, LLC filed this action against Holt Gollatz, doing business as New World Strategies, LLC, on November 19, 2025. SolarKal invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), alleging that the parties were citizens of different states and that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000.

Because both parties were limited liability companies, the court issued an order requiring SolarKal to explain why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The court stated that SolarKal needed to identify the citizenship of each member of SolarKal and Holt Gollatz to establish complete diversity.

Court's reasoning

SolarKal's response stated that it was a New York limited liability company and that the defendant was a Pennsylvania limited liability company. The court found those allegations insufficient. For diversity purposes, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members; its state of organization or incorporation does not establish citizenship for this purpose. SolarKal did not allege the citizenship of any member of either company, so the court could not determine that complete diversity existed.

Disposition

The court dismissed the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. SolarKal was directed to serve a copy of the order on Holt Gollatz and retain proof of service. Judge Gregory H. Woods signed the order on November 24, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.