Jenkins v. Annucci
- Clarke
- 7:25-cv-07478
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 28
In Terrell Jenkins v. Anthony Annucci, Judge Clarke ordered Jenkins to file an amended complaint identifying additional defendants.
Terrell Jenkins must file an amended complaint by December 19, 2025 if he wants to name the newly identified individual defendants. The defendants and potential defendants are affected because the court may later screen the amended complaint and direct service on newly named defendants.
What happened
In Terrell Jenkins v. Anthony Annucci, the New York State Attorney General provided Jenkins with the identities of two deputy superintendents at Sing Sing Correctional Facility who held those positions in October 2022.
The court ordered Jenkins to file an amended complaint by December 19, 2025, naming any newly identified individuals he wants to add. The amended complaint will replace, rather than supplement, his original complaint.
Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke said the court will screen the amended complaint and may later issue an order directing service on new defendants. This order did not decide whether Jenkins’s claims were valid.
The detailed version
- Jenkins v. Annucci · No. 7:25-cv-07478
- Clarke
- Nov. 24, 2025
What the Order Does
The court stated that, under an earlier order, the Office of the New York State Attorney General served Terrell Jenkins with the identities of the Deputy Superintendents of Administration and Security at Sing Sing Correctional Facility in October 2022.
The court ordered Jenkins to file an amended complaint by December 19, 2025, naming any newly identified individual defendants he wants to add to the lawsuit. The amended complaint will replace—not supplement—the original complaint.
Next Steps
After Jenkins files the amended complaint, the court will screen it. Screening is the court’s review of a prisoner’s complaint before service to determine whether the pleading may proceed. If necessary, the court will issue an order directing service on the newly identified defendants. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Jenkins a copy of the order and the Attorney General’s letter identifying the officials.
What Was Not Decided
The order did not decide the merits of Jenkins’s civil-rights claims, including his allegations concerning an assault at Sing Sing and prison officials’ alleged failure to protect him. It also did not determine whether any defendant is liable or order service at this stage. Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke’s ruling concerned amendment, screening, and possible future service only.
Read the full 28-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.