Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 21, 2025

Fractional Ownership Holdings v. Gangl

Full caption

Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC v. Jeffrey Gangl; Jeffrey Gangl v. Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC, Philip Neuman

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:24-cv-09036
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Fractional Ownership Holdings v. Gangl and Gangl v. Fractional Ownership Holdings, Judge Abrams adjourned a conference and set filing requirements.

Who this affects

Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC, Jeffrey Gangl, and Philip Neuman; the conference and case-management deadlines in the two related cases.

What happened

Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC v. Jeffrey Gangl and Jeffrey Gangl v. Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC, Philip Neuman are related cases in which the court had already stayed proceedings for 60 days. The court addressed the next conference and the parties’ case-management filings.

Because of that stay, the court moved the conference scheduled for November 21, 2025, to January 23, 2026, at noon. The court also said the parties could notify it if they were available to meet earlier.

Judge Ronnie Abrams required Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC to notify the court when it found new counsel, stating again that a limited liability company may not proceed without a lawyer. The parties must file an updated proposed case-management plan and scheduling order by January 16, 2026, after Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC and Philip Neuman identify new counsel.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fractional Ownership Holdings v. Gangl · No. 1:24-cv-09036
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Nov. 21, 2025

Background

The two related matters were subject to the Court’s October 14, 2025 order staying proceedings for 60 days. A conference had been scheduled for November 21, 2025.

Order

The Court adjourned the conference to January 23, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. It stated that the parties should inform the Court if they were available to meet before that date.

The Court also required Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC to inform it when the company found new counsel. The Court again advised that a limited liability company may not proceed without a lawyer. The opinion cites Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007), for that point.

The parties must file an updated proposed case-management plan and scheduling order after Fractional Ownership Holdings, LLC and Philip Neuman identify new counsel. The filing is due no later than January 16, 2026.

Disposition

The Court adjourned the conference and imposed the stated notice and filing requirements. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.