Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York…
Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund, Pension Fund, Legal Fund, Scholarship Fund, Industry Training Fund, and 401(k) Savings v. LuxUrban Re Holdings LLC
- Subramanian
- 1:25-cv-06886
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Trustees v. LuxUrban, Judge Subramanian confirmed the arbitration award and granted prejudgment and post-judgment interest.
The petitioner obtained confirmation of the arbitral award, prejudgment interest at 9% per year between the award and judgment, and post-judgment interest. LuxUrban Re Holdings LLC did not oppose the petition.
What happened
In Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund, Pension Fund, Legal Fund, Scholarship Fund, Industry Training Fund, and 401(k) Savings v. LuxUrban Re Holdings LLC, the petitioner asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. The petitioner filed its motion on August 20, 2025.
The court had directed LuxUrban to file any opposition by October 3. The court said LuxUrban appeared to have been served but did not appear in the case, file an opposition, or appear at the arbitration.
Judge Arun Subramanian granted the petition to confirm the arbitration award in full. He also granted prejudgment interest under New York law at 9% per year between the award and the judgment, granted post-judgment interest at the rate set by federal law, and directed the clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York… · No. 1:25-cv-06886
- Subramanian
- Nov. 25, 2025
Background
The petitioner filed a motion on August 20, 2025, asking the court to confirm an arbitral award. The opinion does not state the amount of the award or describe the underlying dispute.
Response
The court directed the respondent to file any opposition by October 3. Although the respondent appeared to have been served, it did not appear in the case, file an opposition, or appear at the arbitration.
Ruling
The court granted the petition to confirm the arbitral award in full. It also granted prejudgment interest under New York law for the period between the arbitral award and the judgment, at a rate of 9% per year. In addition, the court granted post-judgment interest at the rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). The court directed the clerk to close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.