Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 25, 2025

Shteierman v. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-08043
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shteierman v. Qatar Airways, Chief Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Shteierman neither paid filing fees nor sought a fee waiver.

Who this affects

The complaint brought by Yitzchok Shteierman against Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C. was dismissed without prejudice because Shteierman neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed without paying it.

What happened

In Yitzchok Shteierman v. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C., the court had ordered Shteierman to submit an application to proceed without paying court fees or pay the required $405 filing fee within 30 days. The order warned that failing to do so would lead to dismissal.

Shteierman did neither. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling, and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shteierman v. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C. · No. 1:25-cv-08043
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 25, 2025

Background

By an order dated October 3, 2025, the court directed Yitzchok Shteierman either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying court fees, called an in forma pauperis application, or to pay the $405 filing fee required for a civil action. The order gave Shteierman 30 days and stated that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

Ruling

The court found that Shteierman had not submitted the application or paid the fee. It therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.