Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 26, 2025

Zelouf International Corp. v. Belk, Inc., et al.

Judge
Jed Rakoff
Docket
1:25-cv-06797
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Zelouf v. Belk, Judge Moses granted an application, indefinitely postponed the December 3 settlement conference, and ordered a joint status letter.

Who this affects

The parties to the case, including Zelouf International Corp. and defendant ZG Apparel Group LLC, because the scheduled settlement conference was postponed.

What happened

In Zelouf International Corp. v. Belk, Inc., et al., defendant ZG Apparel Group LLC asked to postpone a settlement conference scheduled for December 3, 2025. ZG said it had discovered possible insurance coverage and was still determining whether its insurer would need to attend.

Counsel for Zelouf International Corp. did not object. The parties said they could not yet propose alternative dates because ZG had not determined whether the insurer needed to participate.

The court granted the application, postponed the settlement conference without setting a new date, and ordered the parties to submit a joint status letter by December 8, 2025, proposing new dates. The order was signed by Judge Barbara Moses.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zelouf International Corp. v. Belk, Inc., et al. · No. 1:25-cv-06797
Judge
Jed Rakoff
Date
Nov. 26, 2025

Background

Defendant ZG Apparel Group LLC requested that the court postpone the settlement conference scheduled for December 3, 2025. ZG reported that it had recently discovered that it might have insurance coverage for the dispute, but was still evaluating that coverage and did not know whether its insurance carrier would need to attend the conference. Counsel for plaintiff Zelouf International Corp. did not object.

The parties explained that they could not yet provide two alternative conference dates because they had not determined whether the insurance carrier needed to participate. They asked to postpone the conference for approximately one month and said they would contact the court about available dates by December 8. The request also sought to postpone the deadline for required pre-settlement-conference letters.

Ruling

Judge Barbara Moses granted the application. The settlement conference was adjourned indefinitely, without a new date being set. The parties were ordered to submit a joint status letter no later than December 8, 2025, proposing new dates, preferably in December, for the settlement conference. The order also stated that the parties could contact the courtroom deputy to determine the court’s availability.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.