Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 26, 2025

Shteierman v. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-08043
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shteierman v. Qatar Airways, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied status to appeal without paying filing fees.

Who this affects

The action brought by Yitzchok Shteierman against Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C. was dismissed. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

In Yitzchok Shteierman v. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C., the court dismissed the action. The judgment says the reasons were provided in a November 25, 2025 order, which is not included here.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. As a result, Yitzchok Shteierman was denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the civil judgment on November 26, 2025. The provided judgment does not explain the underlying basis for dismissing the action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shteierman v. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C. · No. 1:25-cv-08043
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 26, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action “for the reasons stated” in its November 25, 2025 order. That earlier order is not included in the provided text, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this judgment alone.

Appeal-Filing Status

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The judgment cites a Supreme Court decision explaining that good faith exists when an appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Effect

The action was dismissed. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice, and it does not describe the claims or defenses. It also does not determine from the provided text whether the dismissal reached the merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.